Does He or Does He Not comply With the Law of The Land : Constitution

Ted Cruz Is The Man To Destroy Obama’s Legacy and Shove It Back Down Barry’s Throat





Posted by 

With the recent announcement by United States Senator Ted Cruz making known his intentions to run for the office of president of the United States in 2016, the orthodox reaction by the left-wing media muckrakers and RINO establishment blowhards was both swift and expected. Neither one of these hypercritics failed to disappoint when it came to expressing their amplified manic hyperbole of obnoxious derision and denigration towards the freshman Senator from Texas. With GOP Representative from New York Peter King’s berserk rant following Cruz’s pronouncement, referring to Cruz as “a guy with a big mouth” and a “carnival barker“, now regarded as one of the most churlish spectacles of undignified conduct shown so far by a Republican in reaction to Cruz’s stated bid for the presidency. Subsequently too, we have in the various provinces of social networking the archetypical white-bread arguments disputing Cruz’s eligibility to be president, despite the fact Cruz’s eligibility had already been confirmed and was declared valid years ago. From this imbroglio of contention on the matter of eligibility have come various, incongruous comparisons between Senator Cruz and president 
A more erroneous and inaccurate attempt at comparisons could not be made.
Continue Reading.....HERE


Comment :
"despite the fact Cruz’s eligibility had already been confirmed and was declared valid years ago"

My question is by whom,confirmed his eligibility, I really like senator Cruz and would vote for him if someone can show me he is eligible by law , not hearsay, by the Constitution ,if we don't follow the Law of the land : Barack Hussein Obama.is what happens and we dont want anymore of his kind.


Cruz manages to get past the primary season with a win. The first problem comes; “will the GOP establishment” go along with the “peoples” choice of the nominee or will they seize control of the convention and force a Jeb Bush nomination because of Cruz’s birth issues? This is a very real issue because even the “Tea Party Constitutional Purest” are questioning whether he can legitimately be President.
Now for the second problem. Let us assume for a moment that Cruz blows past all of the above landmines and actually wins the general election against Hillary. Hillary (and we know what she is like) will no doubt file lawsuits against Cruz’s legitimacy as being Constitutionally legal to be President. This creates an actual “Constitutional Crises” for America. Do we have a President that is even legal? I know what you’re thinking; well heck Ken, we have not a legal one for over 6 years now!
This is different because Obama claimed to be born in America and the media and records (even though they were forged) backed him up. The other issue with that was the McCain was unwilling to challenge him in court. Hillary will not be so polite, particularly because it is widely known that Senator Cruz was actually born in Alberta. This would no doubt cause a legal suite that would end up in the Supreme Court. Then what happens?
If the court ruled that Cruz could not be President, do we have another election? Does Hillary become President because she was 2nd in the vote count? Can you see the can of worms this opens up if Senator Cruz does manage to dodge all those mines and become victorious in his bid?

No comments:

Post a Comment